Despite its noble intentions, the Triple Aim of healthcare may be causing more pain than intended, at least according to a study in the Annals of Family Medicine. And it’s no surprise that nurses and nurse managers are feeling the sting too.
In a previous post, we talked about how the pressure to enhance patient care, improve population health, and reduce costs is contributing to widespread burnout and dissatisfaction among those on the front lines of patient care. In turn, the side effects are ricocheting across all areas of the Triple Aim, negatively impacting everyone and everything it intends to benefit.
What’s going on? Benjamin Franklin may have said it best: “When the well’s dry, we know the worth of water.”
Nurses are stretched thin, balancing greater expectations around quality patient care with more time required to document care processes in EMRs. As a result, more than 50 percent of full-time nurses work an average of 7 hours of overtime each week. And too much overtime eventually results in job dissatisfaction and turnover. As a nursing shortage looms and hospital workloads expand to meet accountable care standards, the situation isn’t likely to improve anytime soon.
How can facilities fill up their wells and then keep them from going dry? Focus groups show that when nurses experience good and healthy work environments, patients have more positive experiences of nursing care. That is, taking good care of patients requires taking good care of nurses. And today that’s not happening enough.
Some say the answer lies in adding a fourth dimension to the Triple Aim. A Quadruple Aim would focus on improving care providers’ work lives and validate their roles in achieving the goals of the Triple Aim.
What would a fourth dimension look like for nurse managers and nurses? Certainly giving both parties more support would help. But adding more staff isn’t the only answer. It really comes down to engagement: the opposite of burnout. And more work needs to be done there. A Gallup study found that 24% of nurses are actively disengaged with their jobs and only 18% are engaged.
When nurses are engaged, patient care improves and the patient experience is better. And in the value-based care era, that’s better for every facility’s bottom line. In addition, when low engagement results in turnover, facilities pay dearly. According to the Journal of Nursing Administration, it costs $82,000 to replace a nurse.
To keep nurses engaged, those in charge must improve working conditions, and we’ve just released a white paper outlining specific tactics for doing just that. In our research, we found three key factors that can help:
The Triple Aim needs some wound care, and a fourth dimension just might be the right salve. For more ideas around nurse engagement and the Triple Aim, check out our new white paper.
In the meantime, we’d love to hear about your experience and your thoughts about how to take better care of those on the front lines of care. Share your comments below!
When we discuss students, we always mention their qualities. Those qualities show what they are…
If you or someone you know is juggling mental health issues alongside substance abuse, understanding…
For the last couple of weeks, the Israel-Hamas conflict has taken over the news cycle.…
Our eyes are invaluable, serving as our windows to the world. The ability to see…
Undoubtedly, one of the most demanding and challenging professions is nursing. Nurses work long hours in…
Echocardiography, or echo for short, is a key diagnostic test used by cardiologists to assess…