A recent blog in The New York Times explored the current and future roles of NPs, and set off a great discussion about what those roles should and will be. At the center was the fact that primary care physicians are badly distributed in the U.S., and that NPs often take on a significant and needed role in rural and poor areas.
Many commenters, however, took a purely MD vs. NP stance. Doesn’t this miss the point?? What do you think? Do you agree that NPs will be extremely important in rural areas in the coming years? Does the difference in NP and MD training provide a significant difference in quality of care?
When we discuss students, we always mention their qualities. Those qualities show what they are…
If you or someone you know is juggling mental health issues alongside substance abuse, understanding…
For the last couple of weeks, the Israel-Hamas conflict has taken over the news cycle.…
Our eyes are invaluable, serving as our windows to the world. The ability to see…
Undoubtedly, one of the most demanding and challenging professions is nursing. Nurses work long hours in…
Echocardiography, or echo for short, is a key diagnostic test used by cardiologists to assess…